Dunes West Deer

Dunes West · Mount Pleasant, SC · November 2025 POA survey

The POA needs 66% approval to start shooting deer inside Dunes West. We are asking you to answer No.

The proposal is an annual cull of roughly 100 animals, carried out with live rounds on common property that borders residential lots, and paid for out of homeowner assessments. The November survey is the step that unlocks it.

Approval needed
66%
Support last year
53%
Deer per year
≈100
Cost to homeowners
up to $1M

01 — What it costs

The cost, line by line

These figures come from the POA's own presentation. They describe a single year. The proposal is not a one-time event, so every line below repeats.

Removal cost per deerContracted sharpshooter services $500
Insurance premium per culling eventThe price the insurance market puts on the risk $60,000
Animals removed per yearRepeated annually, indefinitely 100
All-in cost per deer removedRemoval plus insurance and administration $1,000
Borne by homeowners $1,000,000

Figures as presented in the POA's deer management presentation. If any of them have changed, a correction will be posted here.

02 — The case against

Four reasons to answer No

Not one of these depends on how you feel about deer. You can dislike what they do to your landscaping and still conclude this is the wrong instrument.

It does not work

The herd refills from next door

Dunes West is not an island. Deer move in from Park West, Rivertowne, and the surrounding woods, and an easier food supply produces more fawns. The population is back within two to three years, which is why the cull is described as annual rather than one-time. No other Mount Pleasant neighborhood has adopted this.

Safety and liability

$60,000 a year is what the risk costs

A per-event insurance premium of that size is the clearest available measure of the hazard. Shots would be fired on common and golf course property that borders residential lots, and the golf club has not granted permission. Every error is a claim against the association, and every claim is paid by homeowners.

Resale

It becomes part of every listing conversation

An annual sharpshooter program is something buyers hear about, from an agent or from a neighbor. With a median around $1.2 million, arithmetic makes the exposure plain: a ten percent move is $120,000 of equity per household. We are not predicting that figure. We are pointing out that the downside is far larger than a season of replanted shrubs.

Legal status

It is not currently permitted

Discharging firearms for this purpose is prohibited under Mount Pleasant's ordinance. A 66% result is not the end of the process, it is the mandate the POA would use to pursue a change in town law on the community's behalf. Answering No stops that at the first step.

03 — How to answer

Read the survey carefully. Five of the seven answers can be counted as support.

Only two responses register as unambiguous opposition. Undecided is not neutral in a threshold vote, and neither is asking for more information.

How likely are you to support a deer management program that includes culling?

Response options as written

Counts toward 66%
Very likely
Likely
Maybe
I need more information
Undecided
Clear No
Unlikely
Very unlikelyChoose this
5 of 7 lean yes2 of 7 clear no

If you oppose culling, select Very unlikely. Anything softer can be read as a community that is open to it, and that reading is what carries the vote.

04 — Point by point

What the POA says, and what we would add

We have quoted the association's position as fairly as we can. Where we disagree, we say why.

There is no vote in 2025.

Correct in the narrow sense, and that is the point. The November survey is what the POA would carry to the town as evidence of community support. Reaching 66% is the deciding step, whatever it is called.

Any effect on home values would be brief.

A one-time event fades. A standing annual program does not. Buyers price the schedule, not the first year of it.

Most shooting would occur on common and golf course property.

The golf club has not agreed to participate. Common areas in Dunes West are bordered by residential lots on nearly every side, so "common property" and "away from homes" are not the same statement.

The survey is neutral.

Five of the seven options can be tallied as openness to culling. Two are clear opposition. A neutral instrument would offer a balanced scale.

05 — On "low velocity" rounds

The phrase does not mean what it sounds like

Low velocity generally describes cartridges leaving the muzzle under roughly 2,200 to 2,400 feet per second. It is a category of hunting ammunition, not a safety feature.

Two things worth knowing before you answer

Rounds still travel
These cartridges are built for close-range woods hunting inside about 200 yards. A miss, or a deflection off bone, can send the bullet arcing several hundred yards at the wrong angle. In a neighborhood, that distance covers back yards, roads, and the golf course.
Wounding is a real outcome
Below roughly 1,400 feet per second at impact, a bullet may not expand as designed. The result is a narrow wound channel and an animal that can run 100 to 300 yards before it dies, frequently into a yard that is not the one it was shot in.

06 — What we support instead

We are not arguing for doing nothing

The deer are here and they are staying. The question is whether Dunes West manages that with methods that hold up over a decade, or with an annual event that resets itself every two to three years.

Community landscaping guidance

A published, community-wide list of deer-resistant plantings, with ARB guidance that makes the resistant choice the easy one. This addresses the actual complaint, which is landscape damage.

Organized feeding deterrence

Supplemental feeding, intentional or not, is what concentrates a herd. Coordinated deterrence programs have measurably reduced density in comparable communities without a single round fired.

Fertility control

Immunocontraception is now in routine use across the Southeast. It is slower than a cull and it does not produce a headline, which is precisely why it does not damage a neighborhood's reputation.